During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
目前，R星工作室内外的紧张局势已达到临界点。员工们在收到管理层的严厉警告后保持沉默，他们不仅担心失去工作，还担心落入假信息的陷阱。，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.，详情可参考快连下载安装
res = res.slice(0, res.length - k);
Former US F-35 fighter pilot arrested for training Chinese air force